|
Eleven sites
have been selected to develop workpackages 1, 2, and 3 (the
packages involving field work). Study streams were selected
to have low water quality due to either point sources
(wastewater treatment plant effluents) or diffuse nutrient
sources. To cover a broad range of possible scenarios of the
causes and consequences of this low water quality, we have
considered several study templates (or problem scenarios)
based on the combination of the following physical and
chemical descriptors:
-
Dominant
direction of surface-subsurface water interaction.
In the Mediterranean region, stream surface water
usually recharges subsurface zones, and stream reaches
tend to be "loosing reaches", especially
during summer. In contrast, in mesic regions,
groundwater continuously recharges the surface stream,
and in terms of hydrologic balance, stream reaches tend
to be "gaining reaches".
-
Relative
importance of point versus non-point nutrient sources.
The amount as well as the forms of nutrients entering
the stream depends on the type of land-use practices
developed on each catchment. The degree to which stream
nutrient inputs from the catchment can be controlled
depends on the types of land-use practices. Point
sources are associated with urban and industrial
activities (e.g., inputs from sewage treatment plant
effluents) and are relatively easy to control, whereas
non-point sources are mostly related to agricultural
activities and their control is more complex.
-
Magnitude
of point nutrient sources relative to stream baseflow.
The effect of point nutrient sources on stream water
quality will depend on their input rates relative to the
stream flow and nutrient concentration upstream from the
source. One extreme situation is found in temporary
streams during the dry season, when most of the stream
flow is supported by point sources.
-
Whether
mechanisms of nutrient removal from point sources
prior to discharge into the stream are implemented.
These mechanisms diminish nutrient loads into the
stream, reducing the effect of human activity on stream
water quality. Moreover, the chemical composition
(especially in terms of nitrogen forms) of sewage
effluents from treatment plants with mechanisms of
nutrient removal tends to be more constant and result in
a more stable "environment" for the stream
communities than is the case when treatment plants lack
those mechanisms.
The descriptors are arranged
according to the degree of difficulty with which they can be
controlled by management strategies. Among the descriptors,
only one encompasses physical aspects of the catchment; the
other three express different degrees of human control on
the stream nutrient loads.
Streams have been selected
following the suggestions from the water managers
participating in this project. Streams selection was based
on: a) the existence of background data and information, b)
the fact that they are representatives of common water
quality problems, c) most of the study sites are of special
interest because either the stream water is used for human
consumption in cities located downstream from the study
site, or they are considered sensitive areas according to
the EC Directives.
| STUDY
SITE SELECTION TREE
Click on the name of a
stream to learn about the site |
|
1A. Study
sites with loosing water to groundwater
|
| 2A. Effluent discharge less than the stream
baseflow |
| 3A.
Diffuse loadings higher than
point sources |
|
|
| 3B.
Point sources higher
than diffuse sources |
|
|
|
| 2B. Effluent discharge
higher than the stream
baseflow |
| 3A.
Diffuse loadings higher than
point sources |
| 4A. Without nutrient treatment |
|
Gurri
Stream (Spain) |
| 4B. With
nutrient treatment |
|
[none] |
|
| 3B.
Point sources higher
than diffuse sources |
|
|
|
|
|
1A. Study
sites with gaining water to groundwater
|
| 2A. Effluent discharge less than the stream
baseflow |
| 3A.
Diffuse loadings higher than
point sources |
| 4A. Without nutrient treatment |
|
[none] |
| 4B. With
nutrient treatment |
|
Kleine
Erlauf (Austria) |
|
| 3B.
Point sources higher
than diffuse sources |
|
|
|
| 2B. Effluent discharge
higher than the stream
baseflow |
| 3A.
Diffuse loadings higher than
point sources |
|
|
| 3B. Point sources higher
than diffuse sources |
| 4A. Without nutrient treatment |
|
[none] |
| 4B. With
nutrient treatment |
|
Erpe
Stream (Germany) |
|
|
|
|